Warcraft [Chenghai 3C] 1V1 starting all Raiders DL

Beginning of the revival of lost guns following people to stone A stone A swarm of people do not use skill points to stay
A After the first two skills, learn to sell six drug get a revival of the airship to go the road 2

This time you have a sleep and AM were 3 AM absorbent to absorb 100 points no AM1

Main + more + bees first two skills of her people to absorb rain sleep Drainage

AM will balk at this time or continue to suppress people to Road into the water is clear on down

If the AM for Road seat airship flying with her

10 was still a good time to take pressure can kill a resurrection AM

Stone man sitting pressure airship to End Road Shuaqian AM

Pressure pressure pressure pressure to fly when the AM14-class 15 hole

Stones were even worse this time CD 1 20 seconds and then stops the hole fixed not only in the hole to keep Shuaqian

Complete with a stone to take 15 3 Road Shuaqian 2 heroes take GA

Take to the Road Shuaqian GA skeleton pressure DL2 Road Shuaqian AM

Heroes 3 Y Y only if the pressure of a good second hero TC slower than the AM for about 1 minute

Tired

3 heroes to take Long Road Y with non-toxic and sometimes can take a high

Speed the transfer and then pressing the AM

DL did not seek time of 30 crushed to death but to residual pressure

DL30 also tidy up the equipment to look for AMPK

Y Variable GA missiles landing MK transfiguration of the DL, if, if not to 30AM on 30MK

Dead bees keep the stone were very easy non-toxic

P late hit early split playing

4 heroes heroes BM BMG 5 P, this time can still have the advantage of the opportunity to easily next purple

6 Heroes PAL KOG you pick any 7 hero PL DK you pick any demolition and P are arbitrary

APM120 can go around the peak of the Vietnam War







Recommended links:



How to promote sales will not die



CNNIC proposes to amend the terms of promoting open to individuals, CN domain name registration



Motorola will split into two independent companies



GIS integration of the western expedition Geographic resources



Second-hand computers Xi'an China Merchants Plaza, more than 60 illegal businesses operating wit



ASF to MPEG



Review Clocks And Alarms



Import Of The IPTV How To Do?



MJPEG To AVI



dvd copy blue Ray



brief Science EDUCATION



High-Tech Fair booth solar sail grand Photo



MTS to MOV

Baidu cheating, universally condemned?

Development of the Internet has brought convenience for people's way of life of the city because of its open, universal features and easy to become a hotbed for breeding corruption.


Value of 25 yuan Daitoutie software free of charge銆?銆恌iery discussion
Free software with a list of 60 article published銆?銆恌iery discussion

Recently has been triggered by the Internet and Internet technologies or related to the interests of the endless struggle. Started relying on Internet technology and the odd tiger Yahoo China broke out between the mutual condemnation of the company's saliva war had turned into "you chase me to kill" technology war.

Rogue web sites and rogue software, reckless behavior angered many users, and finally thrown to the "anti-rogue software alliance" of the legal proceedings.

Last week, SAN FRANCISCO companies with Baidu search results because the problem of unfair generated heated debate. How and why things happen, please listen to Peter slowly Road to Hill.

SAN FRANCISCO Rage, Baidu innocence:

September 7, 2006, NEW YORK issued a strongly worded statement, Baidu search will involve the "NEW YORK download" and other keywords and the results point to a direct channel YORK competition download the "sky download" site. SAN FRANCISCO Baidu think it is "deliberately falsified", "malicious manipulation of search results to help enhance the flow of air download," the unscrupulous behavior, thus requiring Baidu company "immediately cease and correct the error, and Baidu website an apology."


[SAN FRANCISCO malicious manipulation that Baidu search results (from TOKYO statement)]

For the allegations SAN FRANCISCO, Baidu will be made in the same day rapid response. Baidu retorted: "This phenomenon is due YORK belong 'NEW YORK download channel' error occurred due to manual editing, the error should bear full responsibility SAN FRANCISCO", and claimed that the "automatic search company Baidu The results are completely objective and fair. "


[Baidu that the issue should be fully responsible for SAN FRANCISCO (from Baidu statement)]

September 8, SAN FRANCISCO response against Baidu released its second statement. In a statement, SAN FRANCISCO shirk its responsibility on Baidu, the practice of refusing to admit deep regret, in addition to once again asked Baidu to error correction of a second to apologize but also declared that "to retain the right to take further legal action."

Technically feasible, the interests say:

Is the so-called "public that goes, both parties said that the Great Wealth." Not further clarify the relevant facts, we ought not jump to conclusions. However, the analysis we now observe the situation, the Shan-po made a stand in favor of the party's choice in SAN FRANCISCO.

With the increasing development of electronic commerce and the gradual popularization of the Internet, Internet has not only the "third media", it became a people's survival tool, way of life. So, network marketing has become a site to promote the importance of corporate strategy, while the use of search engine marketing to improve the visibility of website or business network marketing has become the main way. In general, in front of the site in search results most relevant, and easier to attract the user's attention and visits.

In this way, "PPC" then came into being, has become the search engine's advertising revenue means suppliers. At the same time, some sites do not pay it by way of cheating to improve their ranking in the search results.

These facts tell us that at least two simple facts. First, man-made search service providers can modify the search results are arranged; Second, abnormal results may be directly related to the specific site of action.

In NEW YORK and Baidu's this debate, we see no point in criticizing both sides benefit from the "sky download" site. "The sky download" is not suspected of cheating. In addition to SAN FRANCISCO, there Huajun and a number of software download Web-based business also suffered a similar condition. Baidu also occur in different sites claiming "technical problems" the possibility is not high. Therefore, the issue should be Baidu side.

Claims to have "most comprehensive", "best quality" in Chinese database and the "world's first web analytics technology," and have "the most comprehensive anti-web technology" of the "most accurate" technical Baidu should not lead to emergence Error, the interests of the drive may be Baidu "failure" at the root.

Interests so that Baidu has suffered from a medical institute with a "click fraud" and a digital web of disputes and the "malicious ban" controversy. Now, just to "download the sky," there soon reverted to its pointing to the wrong question, "highly suspicious" How can people not to cast doubt on the students?

Contrary to justice, the image of damage:

Denied, Baidu has been with its advanced search technology and proven Chinese "community" concept of competition in the domestic search engine has achieved the status of absolute advantage. However, good corporate image is important intangible asset, for the well-known enterprises, it is important to consolidate its brand reliance.

In this case, whether it is a proper way or YORK rational Baidu, Baidu finally swallow the bitter fruit of all, not NEW YORK.

It seems the majority of ordinary users, regardless of the reasons, Baidu search keywords appear completely at odds with the results of a fact. Baidu "has powerful search capabilities," the image has been compromised in the eyes of some users. If this is really as NEW YORK said, Baidu's behavior then essentially raise themselves against competitors, has been involved suspected of injustice will surely be condemned by everyone!

As the saying goes, "Virtue does not remain isolated." Although the practice is not just YORK done but only the interests of the war, but should be learned from Baidu.






相关链接:



Picked Components And Libraries



To Work Time "to Steal Food," The Employee Settings, "Health Model"



download unlimited psp games for free



Dreamweaver's CSS layout examples ul and li



TS to MPG



comparison Religion



Decrypt the World Trade Center's First building built on the ruins of



RUP Anti-pattern



MKV To FLV



REVIEWS Audio Speech



Printing MACHINERY "pioneers", "English Education" story



Jinshan listing delayed two days by the profitability of the Hong Kong question DIVERTED



In-depth programming: Control panel Know (Part One)



RMVB To MP4

11n vs. 150M and 300M internal battle cost the king

If the wireless network in the world is divided into two halves, half of which must be as bright as the example of clashes between 3G, while the other half is as quiet as the water gently WiFi. Compared to high-profile 3G, WiFi in the world is always so calm, so the alarm, but that calm does not mean that WiFi in silence, it is ready, waiting for overnight success.

Then in 2009 what the world highlights WiFi? The answer is the 150M, as the IEEE 802.11n standard rate under a standard, it appears not only broke the WiFi world peace, to break the monopoly of 300M. 150M capabilities then what? It is not a lot of people in the "non-mainstream" speed standards? We will duel it 300M to tell you the answer, to tell you who is the king of cost-11n world.

Rectification of names for the 150M it is definitely not "non-mainstream"

150M really is a "non-mainstream" it? Is not true, although many users of traditional values, 802.11n represents the 300M, 300M also represents the 11n, but this is not true, according to IEEE official description, 11n standard was actually For four speed grades, that is, 150M, 300M, 450M and 600M, 150M so that is definitely not "non-mainstream."

150M has been the rectification of names, it's the actual performance of what? It how big the gap 300M? 150M and 300M Who is more worth buying? The answer will duel in the following test revealed for you 11.

Test Content:

The duel will be divided into entry-level product duel, the mainstream level and enterprise-level products products duel duel. In each duel, 150M and 300M will be a wireless router as representatives of parties to participate. Rate test items include single-threaded test, multi-threaded rate testing, and proficiency test signal through walls.

Test method:

Single, multi-threaded test: We will test this by NetIQ Chariot software, wireless routing, single entry (more) pair throughput capacity, with intuitive data show their strength.

Wall proficiency test: we also by NetIQ Chariot software to test, but in the test side and wireless routing separated by a load-bearing walls.

Successful completion of preparatory work, like the wonderful example of clashes between test immediately start, the first duel: the entry-level. Entry-level duel: FAST FW150R VS TP-LINK TL-WR841N






150M Representative: FAST FW150R

FAST FW150R is a quick launch of its latest 150M wireless router, its body is very small, the overall design simple and fashionable; it supports the IEEE 802.11n, IEEE 802.11g, IEEE 802.11b and other standards, theoretical maximum data transfer rate of 150Mbps . With its strength, it is rapidly becoming the entry-level leader in the 150M wireless router. Market Price: 108 yuan






300M Representative: TP-LINK TL-WR841N

TP-LINK TL-WR841N wireless router set wired / wireless in one, the overall shape the same simple fashion; it is consistent with IEEE 802.11n (draft standard), IEEE 802.11g, IEEE 802.11b and other standards, the maximum wireless transfer rate up to 300Mbps; it 300M wireless router is the entry-level representatives of the classic. Market Price: 215 yuan

Vs. single-threaded test start:











FW150R: 60.360Mbps TL-WR841N: 59.334Mbps

Multithreaded Test:











FW150R: 74.123Mbps TL-WR841N: 78.362Mbps

Wall Test:











FW150R: 25.404Mbps TL-WR841N: 34.362Mbps

Summary: Gap 150M little more cost-effective

Comparison test by the three we can see, 150M and 300M for the overall gap is very small, even in single-threaded test results over the 300M, 150M's performance is excellent. On the whole, 150M 300M product's performance is about 90% of the product, the price of the former is only 50% of the latter, cost-effective at a glance. Therefore, the duel in the entry-level products, 150M win. Vs. flow-level products: Tenda W311R VS ASUS RT-N11 +






150M: Tenda W311R

Tenda W311R's a classic 150M wireless router, which uses both gray and white color design, stylish looks generous, modern full. It supports IEEE 802.11n, IEEE 802.11g, IEEE 802.11b and other standards, theoretical maximum data transfer rate of 150Mbps. Since its launch, it has been a majority of the customers and become one of the products of choice for mainstream users. Market Price: 130 yuan






ASUS RT-N11 +

ASUS RT-N11 + is the latest of a 300M wireless router, which uses the white of the design style, demonstrates the high-end products temperament; it supports the IEEE 802.11n, IEEE 802.11g, IEEE 802.11b and other standards; Because of its superior performance, it is available soon on board the "speed king" of the throne and become the absolute representative of 300M. Market Price: 285 yuan

Vs. single-threaded test start:











W311R: 53.417Mbps RT-N11 +: 72.675Mbps

Multithreaded Test:











W311R: 79.237Mbps RT-N11 +: 89.434Mbps

Wall Test:











W311R: 25.620Mbps RT-N11 +: 33.328Mbps

Summary: 300M 150M strength was more cost-effective

Comparison test in the mainstream products, we see a strong representative 300M strength, ASUS RT-N11 +'s performance does have a good style of the King. Tenda W311R with it, but the gap is not too great, one of only a difference of up to 19Mbps, the same satisfactory performance, taking into account the W311R price of only 130 yuan, the same cost advantage is obvious. Therefore, the duel of the mainstream products, 150M of the cost the same than 300M. Vs. Enterprise Product: Belkin F6D4230zh4 VS NETGEAR WNR2000






Belkin F6D4230zh4

F6D4230zh4 is Belkin's of a classic 150M wireless router, which uses a piano paint, frosted panel, and feel very good material, when people first get our hands on a kind of love the feel. It supports IEEE 802.11n, IEEE 802.11g, IEEE 802.11b and other standards, theoretical maximum data transfer rate of 150Mbps. Since its launch, it has by virtue of superior performance by the many high-end enterprise-class users of all ages, a classic market. Market Price: 398 yuan






NETGEAR WNR2000

WNR2000 NETGEAR's is an "alternative" in the 300M wireless router, which uses black piano paint materials, which is the traditional "white gold family" style is completely different. Although the appearance has changed, but it still maintains the performance advantages of NETGEAR in the industry, working with NETGEAR products also uphold the fine. It supports IEEE 802.11n, IEEE 802.11g / b standard, the maximum theoretical transfer rate of 300Mbps. Its overall performance is outstanding, you can easily respond to the diverse needs of enterprise customers. Market Price: 550

Vs. single-threaded test start:











F6D4230zh4: 51.319Mbps WNR2000: 65.250Mbps

Multithreaded Test:











F6D4230zh4: 52.076Mbps WNR2000: 87.322Mbps

Wall Test:











F6D4230zh4: 27.438Mbps WNR2000: 33.328Mbps

Summary: very cost-effective performance are excellent

Enterprise-class products in the test, 150M and 300M fierce competition until the final winner of a failed test, both performed satisfactorily. For small business-class customers, Belkin F6D4230zh4 is definitely a good choice; while for medium and large enterprise users, the NETGEAR WNR2000 is the best partner. Comprehensive view, in this round duel, 150M and 300M to fight and.

Summary: 150M subtle performance the best choice for home users

After three rounds of the confrontation, we want to applaud the performance of 150M wonderful product, although it is less than 300M products in terms of speed, but the gap is very small with the overall performance of the product can reach 300M 80%, this performance is indeed praiseworthy; 150M product that taking into account the low price (about 300M price of 50%), can be said that 150M is a well-deserved cost 11n king. 11n be popular in the era of modern family if you are a user, if you are in need of a wireless network products that 150M is definitely your best choice because it is the new "king of cost-effective."







Recommended links:



VOB to FLV



microsoft vbscript runtime error 800A01C2



DAT to MPEG



DV to AVI



Fireworks Produced lovely "onion" Little P child



OO, OO later, AND the limit



RAILWAY



Lists Chat And Instant Messaging



Sogou Pinyin input method and how to do conflict game?



Good Efficacy Is The Man Manao Out



Teach you when the head: how to reduce your staff turnover rate?



Evaluation Management And Distribution



What is the Best Tone